308 Win., slow 6.5, fast 6.5, the occasional 7 SAUM or WSM or the lightning bolt of a long-action. Students generally bring one of only six or eight ballistic profiles to a course slow. For each student in a 16-student class that takes time - Valuable time that I am being paid for on a firing line. I need to dig into what is really going on… deep into the voodoo, and find a better, more predictable solution for that student, without having to chrono his rifle and pull up B.C. Going hands on with each and every student I can spit out a generic come-up and hope for the best, but am I really doing the student a service, limiting his percentage for a miss and not driving up his round count? I’m a professional.
They are looking to me for the answer and it needs to be closer to right.
#X factor math calculator full#
But I’m an instructor, on a line full of wide-eyed students, all awaiting my recommendation for data to put on the rifle in order to get a hit on the next target at the next 100-yard increment while gathering “try DOPE”. That’s all great when I’m dealing with my known rifle, utilizing my known load, and my known fundamentals, which have been polished by tens of years of development and discipline and removing any influence I may contribute to an errant flight of that bullet. Or a drop solution produced by a complicated algorithm. No way to figure this stuff out without known D.O.P.E. That is, AFTER the algorithm bounces our bullet’s performance characteristics off the atmospherics conditions provided by link-up to Bluetooth devices that use other algorithms to spit out numbers representing atmospheric condition.
Algorithms utilize our input parameters and spit out numbers representing ballistic come-up.
0 kommentar(er)
